Please Hold the Inflammatory Rhetoric When It Comes to Controversial Issues

Electronic device for tracking school children offers a good example.

I've always been frustrated by people who, in an effort to state their case, use inflammatory comments to garner quick support for their point of view from people who generally haven't researched or thought the topic through.

These comments rarely, if ever, add anything useful to the debate. More often than not, they are designed to, and usually succeed at, taking focus away from the real issue — which is probably the original intent of the person making the comment.

This tactic is used altogether too much in the political arena these days, I’m sad to say. Actually, quite often, it seems like it’s the only tactic being used in the political arena.

I have found that when I write articles on social issues and use political examples, people jump right into their own political views and tend to miss the point I was trying to make. So instead of heading into the political hurricane this time, I’ll use another example I recently read about in the news.

A Texas school district has begun using RFID tags to monitor the whereabouts of children while in school. The use of this technology for this purpose is not new, but it is starting to create a bit of a controversy.

RFID tags are small electronic chips that give off a very weak radio signal. When the tag passes by a scanner, its information is recorded and sent to a computer. Each RFID tag can be coded with information like a unique ID number.

Think of the “EZ Pass” system used for collecting tolls without needing to stop at the tollbooth. When a car passed through, the ID tag is read and the appropriate toll is subtracted from the user's account.

The basic idea in the schools is to use them for better control of attendance.  How much a school gets paid is directly proportional to the number of children who attend school on a given day.

Schools that have started to use these chips have found that many children that had been marked as absent in the past have actually been in the school. They just haven’t been in the room while attendance was being taken. The RFID system takes all the guesswork out it.

Now, as with nearly all new use of technology, a number of people oppose this type of tracking of students while at school. They raise privacy concerns, health concerns, etc. Of course, these, and all issues, should be brought to the table to be discussed and reviewed, but always in the context of the larger issue, which should be the safety of our children. Unfortunately, this isn’t usually the case.

Marc Rotenberg is the executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a group concerned with issues of privacy in using the RFID tags with school students. Rotenberg said in a telephone interview, “We don’t think kids in schools should be treated like cattle”.

When I hear comments like these, it does nothing but take away any credibility the speaker might have had. Just because RFID tags have been used with cattle doesn't equate to our children being treated like cattle. It’s pretty lousy logic.

But it's a good sound bite that will get plenty of press, and it’s sure rile up those who haven't thoroughly researched and thought through the situation. RFID tags are used for groceries and other forms of inventory control as well. But Rotenberg didn't say "treated like groceries." I guess "groceries" just doesn't have the same inflammatory effect that "cattle" does.

I don’t see any real privacy concerns in using these tags with schoolchildren. Schools are supposed to know where their students are at all times throughout the day. Nothing changes except for the precision and detail of that knowledge. I’m thinking that Rotenberg doesn’t have much to say directly related to privacy either, hence the inflammatory remark about cattle. So before we jump on the "losing our privacy" bandwagon, let's look at a few issues this new technology could address.

One of the most obvious is the administration knowing immediately when a student has left the school grounds. Schools are responsible for the safety of our children. As a parent, I'd like the school to know immediately if my child has left the school grounds without permission. That’s not a privacy concern, that’s a safety concern. Minors don’t get to make those kinds of decisions for themselves.

Perhaps a student hasn’t shown up for class. Instead of relying on the teacher to notice the missing student, the system could immediately flag and locate that missing student, who could be sick, injured or simply ditching class. In any case, the student’s needs could be addressed immediately.

Another area that would strongly benefit is that of bullying. Take the scenario of a student who has been repeatedly harassed by a bully. Each of those students could be flagged in the system as two students that should not have prolonged contact with each other.

Using an RFID location system, the computer could easily alert someone in the office that those two students are in close proximity with each other. This approach could prevent a whole host of harassment and bullying issues and go a long way toward keeping students safe.

Taking the “EZ Pass” approach, instead of buying lunch tickets or carrying cash around with them, kids could use an online account to pay for items at school. When students needed to buy lunch or other items, the account connected with the ID could be billed. No need to carry cash that could get lost or stolen.

There are certainly many more uses for this technology that have yet to be realized. And certainly, all new uses of technology need to be well thought through for possible risks. But let’s keep those discussions pertinent and free of inflammatory rhetoric — rhetoric that's designed to make people react emotionally because your point of view is weak on the facts.

Daniella Ruiz October 28, 2012 at 07:40 PM
i agree. too many people have lost the thread of community that goes with a social conscience that serves the betterment of all. the impetus to 'be the best you can be' at the demise of all those around you, has encouraged a simplistic self importance of one's own perceptions. we may have the best darned sense of freedom and independence, but it must be tempered with some self restraint and awareness of other's. as for the RFID issue, those devices are benign, they have no internal power source, so they do not actually emit any sort of radio energy detectable. only when they are within the radio field of a transponder do they use that field energy (measured on the order of microwatts) to power their own internal circuits, and then bounce their unique ID data stream back to the transponder for use in the greater system. the range is measured in inches or a few feet distance. the transponders are similar to the inventory control/thief systems you find at retail stores. nothing new at all, we have all been thru thousands of those so far and no hint of an infarct or widespread cancer developing in the population. people will use anything new to assert their own 'fear of the unknown' and attempt to dissuade use of it. education and fact sharing is essential in this age. the children could probably care less, just another gadget to play with. many things we take for granted but keeping all of us in one piece is essential for all of us to survive as a nation.
Sandy D'Esopo October 31, 2012 at 02:13 PM
There are legitimate privacy issues concerning RFID tags, but if their only use is to keep tabs on kids in school, probably no invasion of privacy is threatened. However, other uses, such as by the police, might be reason for concern. As to inflammatory rhetoric, all too often it's to compensate for a weak argument. The trend toward vitriol in what passes for political debate nowadays, I blame on name-callers like Rush Limbaugh, and the deliberate strategy to delegitimize congress begun by Newt Gingrich. As Speaker of the House, he urged the GOP to no longer have lunches or other wise fraternize with Democrats, to use loaded terms like 'enemy' when referring to opponents. HIs ultimate aim was to change congress from a debating and compromising body to one more like the English parliamentary system where opposing parties fight each other, never compromising, regardless of the consequences to the nation. In large, Gingrich has succeeded, with the result that our legislators can accomplish very little. It's a shame.
Daniella Ruiz November 02, 2012 at 05:23 AM
your insight reminds me of the 'united we stand, divided we fall' quote that has strengthened many a nation rather than damaged it. this speech may interest you. http://www.hazaeshaladas.hu/ftp/speech_of_mr_gordon_bajnai_-_23_october_2012.pdf


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »